ETF comparison

EQQB vs XNAS

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
IE00BFZXGZ54Invesco
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
IE00BMFKG444Xtrackers
Figures as of October 1, 2026 (EQQB) · October 1, 2026 (XNAS)

The comparison in short

EQQB (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc, IE00BFZXGZ54) and XNAS (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BMFKG444) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.30% for EQQB, 0.1 percentage points less, or about 10 a year on 10,000 invested. EQQB is the larger fund, with USD 21.96bn in assets against GBP 2.16bn for XNAS. 8 of the holdings published by EQQB (top 10) and XNAS (top 10) appear in both lists; measured on those published positions only, the overlap is at least 42.3%. Shared holdings include Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft and Micron Technology. In 2025, EQQB returned +20.6% and XNAS +20.7%, a gap of 0.1 percentage points. Over 5 years, EQQB returned +16.0% a year and XNAS +16.1% a year. EQQB and XNAS both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). EQQB and XNAS both hold the index securities directly (physical replication). Both are domiciled in Ireland. EQQB and XNAS both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 5 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Side by side

FigureEQQBXNAS
ISINIE00BFZXGZ54IE00BMFKG444
Exchange tickersEQQB, EQACXNAS, XNAQ
Fund houseInvescoXtrackers
Total expense ratio (TER)0.30%0.20%
Ongoing charges (KID)0.30%0.20%
Fund sizeUSD 21.96bnGBP 2.16bn
Launch dateSeptember 24, 2018January 21, 2021
ReplicationPhysicalPhysical
DomicileIrelandIreland
Distribution policyAccumulatingAccumulating
Share class currencyUSDUSD
Number of holdings103—
Risk indicator (SRRI)5 / 75 / 7
SFDR classificationArticle 6—
BenchmarkNASDAQ-100 Index (USD)NASDAQ 100 Index (USD)

Performance

Calendar-year returns

YearEQQBXNASDifference
2025+20.6%+20.7%−0.1
2024+25.4%+25.5%−0.1
2023+54.5%+54.6%−0.1
2022−32.6%−32.6%0.0

Annualised returns

PeriodEQQBXNASDifference
1 year+23.3%+23.4%−0.1
3 years+27.6%+28.0%−0.4
5 years+16.0%+16.1%−0.1
Returns as published by each fund house, in each share class's currency and net of the fund's charges. The difference is in percentage points. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Holdings

8 of the holdings published by EQQB (top 10) and XNAS (top 10) appear in both lists; measured on those published positions only, the overlap is at least 42.3%. Shared holdings include Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft and Micron Technology.

Top 10 holdings of EQQB

#HoldingWeight
1
NvidiaIn both
8.52%
2
AppleIn both
7.42%
3
MicrosoftIn both
6.01%
4
Micron TechnologyIn both
4.76%
5
AmazonIn both
4.46%
6
Advanced Micro DevicesIn both
3.38%
7
AlphabetIn both
3.15%
8
TeslaIn both
2.93%
9
AlphabetIn both
2.92%
10
Broadcom
2.80%

Top 10 holdings of XNAS

#HoldingWeight
1
NVIDIAIn both
8.41%
2
APPLEIn both
7.29%
3
MICROSOFTIn both
5.76%
4
MICRON TECHNOLOGYIn both
5.18%
5
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICESIn both
4.20%
6
AMAZON COM INCIn both
4.05%
7
META PLATFORMS CLASS A
3.27%
8
ALPHABET CLASS AIn both
3.00%
9
TESLA INCIn both
2.81%
10
ALPHABET CLASS CIn both
2.80%
Compare every published holding of EQQB and XNAS in the overlap checker

Sectors and countries

Largest sectors of EQQB

  1. Information technology58.6%
  2. Communication services13.7%
  3. Consumer discretionary11.1%
  4. Consumer staples6.2%
  5. Health care4.0%
  6. Industrials3.6%
+ 4 more

Largest sectors of XNAS

  1. Technology62.7%
  2. Consumer Discretionary13.7%
  3. Others9.4%
  4. Consumer Staples5.3%
  5. Health Care3.7%

Largest countries of EQQB

  1. United States97.0%
  2. Netherlands1.1%
  3. Canada1.0%
  4. Brazil0.4%
  5. China0.2%
  6. United Kingdom0.2%

Largest countries of XNAS

  1. United States95.6%
  2. Netherlands1.4%
  3. Canada0.9%
  4. Ireland0.9%
  5. United Kingdom0.7%
  6. Others0.6%

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between EQQB and XNAS?

EQQB (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc, IE00BFZXGZ54) and XNAS (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BMFKG444) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.30% for EQQB, 0.1 percentage points less, or about 10 a year on 10,000 invested. EQQB and XNAS both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). EQQB and XNAS both hold the index securities directly (physical replication). Both are domiciled in Ireland. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Which is cheaper, EQQB or XNAS?

XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.30% for EQQB, 0.1 percentage points less, or about 10 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.30% for EQQB and 0.20% for XNAS.

Which is bigger, EQQB or XNAS?

EQQB is the larger fund, with USD 21.96bn in assets against GBP 2.16bn for XNAS.

Do EQQB and XNAS hold the same companies?

8 of the holdings published by EQQB (top 10) and XNAS (top 10) appear in both lists; measured on those published positions only, the overlap is at least 42.3%. Shared holdings include Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft and Micron Technology.

How did EQQB and XNAS perform in 2025?

In 2025, EQQB returned +20.6% and XNAS +20.7%, a gap of 0.1 percentage points. Over 5 years, EQQB returned +16.0% a year and XNAS +16.1% a year. Over the past year, EQQB returned +23.3% and XNAS +23.4%. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Are EQQB and XNAS accumulating or distributing?

EQQB is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. XNAS is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.

Go further

Other comparisons

Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.