ETF comparisonFigures as of October 1, 2026 (WRDA) · October 1, 2026 (XMWO)
WRDA vs XMWO
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc
IE00BD4TXV59UBS Asset ManagementXtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C
LU0274208692XtrackersThe comparison in short
WRDA (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc, IE00BD4TXV59) and XMWO (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C, LU0274208692) both track the MSCI World index. WRDA has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.06% a year against 0.45% for XMWO, 0.39 percentage points less, or about 39 a year on 10,000 invested. WRDA reports USD 17.8bn in assets and XMWO GBP 10.90bn. XMWO replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured. In 2025, WRDA returned +21.3% and XMWO +21.0%, a gap of 0.3 percentage points. Over 5 years, WRDA returned +11.9% a year and XMWO +11.7% a year. WRDA and XMWO both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). WRDA is domiciled in Ireland and XMWO in Luxembourg. WRDA and XMWO both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 4 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.
Side by side
| Figure | WRDA | XMWO |
|---|---|---|
| ISIN | IE00BD4TXV59 | LU0274208692 |
| Exchange tickers | WRDA, WRDB, WRDK | XMWO, XMWD, DB31 |
| Fund house | UBS Asset Management | Xtrackers |
| Total expense ratio (TER) | 0.06% | 0.45% |
| Ongoing charges (KID) | 0.06% | 0.45% |
| Fund size | USD 17.8bn | GBP 10.90bn |
| Launch date | June 7, 2019 | December 19, 2006 |
| Replication | — | Synthetic (swap) |
| Domicile | Ireland | Luxembourg |
| Distribution policy | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Share class currency | USD | USD |
| Risk indicator (SRRI) | 4 / 7 | 4 / 7 |
| SFDR classification | Article 6 | — |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Total Return Net | MSCI Total Return Net World Index (USD) |
Performance
Calendar-year returns
| Year | WRDA | XMWO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +21.3% | +21.0% | +0.3 |
| 2024 | +18.9% | +18.6% | +0.3 |
| 2023 | +23.8% | +23.7% | +0.1 |
| 2022 | −18.3% | −18.2% | −0.1 |
| 2021 | +21.6% | +21.8% | −0.2 |
| 2020 | +15.8% | +16.0% | −0.2 |
Annualised returns
| Period | WRDA | XMWO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | +15.2% | +14.5% | +0.7 |
| 3 years | +21.5% | +21.2% | +0.3 |
| 5 years | +11.9% | +11.7% | +0.2 |
Holdings
XMWO replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.
Top 10 holdings of WRDA
| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVIDIA CORP | 5.86% |
| 2 | APPLE INC | 5.45% |
| 3 | MICROSOFT CORP | 4.04% |
| 4 | AMAZON.COM INC | 2.69% |
| 5 | ALPHABET INC-CL A | 2.25% |
| 6 | ALPHABET INC-CL C | 1.78% |
| 7 | META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 1.77% |
| 8 | BROADCOM INC | 1.77% |
| 9 | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.34% |
| 10 | TESLA INC | 1.13% |
Top 10 holdings of XMWO
XMWO replicates its index through a swap: the securities it publishes are the collateral basket behind the swap, not the index, so they are not compared.| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAZON COM INC | 5.74% |
| 2 | MICROSOFT | 4.30% |
| 3 | NVIDIA | 4.22% |
| 4 | APPLE | 3.43% |
| 5 | NOVARTIS AG | 3.29% |
| 6 | NESTLE SA | 3.12% |
| 7 | SYNOPSYS | 2.75% |
| 8 | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B | 2.58% |
| 9 | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 2.50% |
| 10 | WALMART | 2.07% |
Sectors and countries
Largest sectors of XMWO
- 38.0%
- 10.9%
- 10.4%
- 10.1%
- 9.2%
Largest countries of XMWO
- 76.4%
- 7.4%
- 3.1%
- 2.1%
- 1.9%
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between WRDA and XMWO?
WRDA (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc, IE00BD4TXV59) and XMWO (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C, LU0274208692) both track the MSCI World index. WRDA has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.06% a year against 0.45% for XMWO, 0.39 percentage points less, or about 39 a year on 10,000 invested. WRDA and XMWO both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). WRDA is domiciled in Ireland and XMWO in Luxembourg. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.Which is cheaper, WRDA or XMWO?
WRDA has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.06% a year against 0.45% for XMWO, 0.39 percentage points less, or about 39 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.06% for WRDA and 0.45% for XMWO.Which is bigger, WRDA or XMWO?
WRDA reports USD 17.8bn in assets and XMWO GBP 10.90bn.Do WRDA and XMWO hold the same companies?
XMWO replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.How did WRDA and XMWO perform in 2025?
In 2025, WRDA returned +21.3% and XMWO +21.0%, a gap of 0.3 percentage points. Over 5 years, WRDA returned +11.9% a year and XMWO +11.7% a year. Over the past year, WRDA returned +15.2% and XMWO +14.5%. Past performance does not predict future returns.Are WRDA and XMWO accumulating or distributing?
WRDA is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. XMWO is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.Go further
Other comparisons
- HMWA vs WRDAHSBC MSCI WORLD UCITS ETF USD (Acc) · UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc
- IWDA vs WRDAiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF · UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc
- HMWD vs WRDAHSBC MSCI WORLD UCITS ETF · UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc
- UBU7 vs WRDAUBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD dis · UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc
- WRDA vs SWRDUBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc · State Street® SPDR® MSCI World UCITS ETF (Acc)
- WRDA vs XDWDUBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD acc · Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.