ETF comparisonFigures as of October 22, 2026 (XMME) · October 20, 2026 (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap)
XMME vs Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
IE00BTJRMP35XtrackersAmundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc
LU2573967036AmundiThe comparison in short
XMME (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BTJRMP35) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc, LU2573967036) both track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.18% for XMME, 0.04 percentage points less, or about 4 a year on 10,000 invested. XMME is the larger fund, with USD 14.0bn in assets against USD 5.8bn for Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap, about 2.4 times the size. Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured. In 2025, XMME returned +33.7% and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap +33.9%, a gap of 0.2 percentage points. Over 3 years, XMME returned +22.1% a year and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap +22.8% a year. XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XMME holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). XMME is domiciled in Ireland and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap in Luxembourg. XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 4 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.
Side by side
| Figure | XMME | Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap |
|---|---|---|
| ISIN | IE00BTJRMP35 | LU2573967036 |
| Exchange tickers | XMME, XMMS | — |
| Fund house | Xtrackers | Amundi |
| Total expense ratio (TER) | 0.18% | 0.14% |
| Ongoing charges (KID) | 0.18% | 0.14% |
| Fund size | USD 14.0bn | USD 5.8bn |
| Launch date | June 21, 2017 | March 24, 2023 |
| Replication | Physical | Synthetic (swap) |
| Domicile | Ireland | Luxembourg |
| Distribution policy | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Share class currency | USD | USD |
| Number of holdings | — | 349 |
| Risk indicator (SRRI) | 4 / 7 | 4 / 7 |
| SFDR classification | — | Article 6 |
| Benchmark | MSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets Index | MSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return USD Index |
Performance
Calendar-year returns
| Year | XMME | Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +33.7% | +33.9% | −0.2 |
| 2024 | +7.5% | +7.6% | −0.1 |
Annualised returns
| Period | XMME | Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | +16.4% | +18.2% | −1.8 |
| 3 years | +22.1% | +22.8% | −0.7 |
Holdings
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.
Top 10 holdings of XMME
| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING | 15.79% |
| 2 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD | 6.64% |
| 3 | SK HYNIX | 4.47% |
| 4 | TENCENT HOLDINGS | 2.63% |
| 5 | ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING | 1.83% |
| 6 | MEDIATEK | 1.56% |
| 7 | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H | 0.92% |
| 8 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE | 0.89% |
| 9 | DELTA ELECTRONICS | 0.82% |
| 10 | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY | 0.81% |
Top 10 holdings of Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap replicates its index through a swap: the securities it publishes are the collateral basket behind the swap, not the index, so they are not compared.| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAZON.COM INC | 6.28% |
| 2 | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.57% |
| 3 | APPLE INC | 4.03% |
| 4 | ALPHABET INC CL C | 3.97% |
| 5 | NVIDIA CORP | 3.96% |
| 6 | APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 3.27% |
| 7 | MICROSOFT CORP | 3.21% |
| 8 | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.86% |
| 9 | INTEL CORP | 2.52% |
| 10 | BROADCOM INC | 2.07% |
Sectors and countries
Largest sectors of XMME
- 45.0%
- 18.7%
- 16.5%
- 7.3%
- 6.7%
- 5.9%
Largest sectors of Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap
- 40.7%
- 20.6%
- 7.9%
- 6.1%
- 6.1%
- 6.1%
Largest countries of XMME
- 26.6%
- 24.2%
- 18.5%
- 15.7%
- 11.3%
- 3.8%
Largest countries of Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap
- 28.9%
- 20.4%
- 18.4%
- 11.5%
- 5.0%
- 3.2%
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap?
XMME (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BTJRMP35) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc, LU2573967036) both track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.18% for XMME, 0.04 percentage points less, or about 4 a year on 10,000 invested. XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XMME holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). XMME is domiciled in Ireland and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap in Luxembourg. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.Which is cheaper, XMME or Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap?
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.18% for XMME, 0.04 percentage points less, or about 4 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.18% for XMME and 0.14% for Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap.Which is bigger, XMME or Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap?
XMME is the larger fund, with USD 14.0bn in assets against USD 5.8bn for Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap, about 2.4 times the size.Do XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap hold the same companies?
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.How did XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap perform in 2025?
In 2025, XMME returned +33.7% and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap +33.9%, a gap of 0.2 percentage points. Over 3 years, XMME returned +22.1% a year and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap +22.8% a year. Over the past year, XMME returned +16.4% and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap +18.2%. Past performance does not predict future returns.Are XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap accumulating or distributing?
XMME is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.Go further
- XMME (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C): full fund page
- Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc): full fund page
- All funds tracking MSCI Emerging Markets
- Compare the largest holdings of XMME and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap in the overlap checker
- All ETF comparisons
Other comparisons
- Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets vs XMMEXtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D · Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
- iShares MSCI vs XMMEiShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) · Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
- XMME vs E127Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C · Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
- Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets vs Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets SwapXtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D · Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc
- iShares MSCI vs Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets SwapiShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) · Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc
- E127 vs Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets SwapAmundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist · Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Acc
Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.