ETF comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World vs VWRL

Figures as of October 2, 2026 (Invesco FTSE All-World) · September 30, 2026 (VWRL)

The comparison in short

Invesco FTSE All-World (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc, IE000716YHJ7) and VWRL (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing, IE00B3RBWM25) both track the FTSE All-World index. VWRL has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.15% for Invesco FTSE All-World, 0.01 percentage points less, or about 1 a year on 10,000 invested. VWRL is the larger fund, with USD 87.29bn in assets against USD 5.27bn for Invesco FTSE All-World, about 17 times the size. 1 of the largest holdings of Invesco FTSE All-World (top 10) and VWRL (top 10) appears in both lists; measured on those positions only, the overlap is at least 1.6%. Shared holdings include BROADCOM INC NPV. In 2025, Invesco FTSE All-World returned +22.5% and VWRL +22.6%, a gap of 0.1 percentage points. Over 3 years, Invesco FTSE All-World returned +22.1% a year and VWRL +21.7% a year. Invesco FTSE All-World reinvests its income (accumulating), while VWRL pays it out (distributing). Both are domiciled in Ireland. Invesco FTSE All-World carries a risk indicator (SRRI) of 5 and VWRL of 4, on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Side by side

FigureInvesco FTSE All-WorldVWRL
ISINIE000716YHJ7IE00B3RBWM25
Exchange tickers—VWRL, VWRD, VGWL
Fund houseInvescoVanguard
Total expense ratio (TER)0.15%0.14%
Ongoing charges (KID)0.15%0.14%
Fund sizeUSD 5.27bnUSD 87.29bn
Launch dateJune 26, 2023May 22, 2012
ReplicationPhysical—
DomicileIrelandIreland
Distribution policyAccumulatingDistributing
Share class currencyUSDUSD
Number of holdings—4,093
Risk indicator (SRRI)5 / 74 / 7
SFDR classificationArticle 6—
BenchmarkFTSE All-World Index (USD)FTSE All World Index USD Net of Tax

Performance

Calendar-year returns

YearInvesco FTSE All-WorldVWRLDifference
2025+22.5%+22.6%−0.1
2024+17.6%+17.2%+0.4

Annualised returns

PeriodInvesco FTSE All-WorldVWRLDifference
1 year+16.5%+16.7%−0.2
3 years+22.1%+21.7%+0.4
Returns as published by each fund house, in each share class's currency and net of the fund's charges. The difference is in percentage points. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Holdings

1 of the largest holdings of Invesco FTSE All-World (top 10) and VWRL (top 10) appears in both lists; measured on those positions only, the overlap is at least 1.6%. Shared holdings include BROADCOM INC NPV.

Top 10 holdings of Invesco FTSE All-World

#HoldingWeight
1
NVIDIA CORP USD0.001
5.19%
2
APPLE INC USD0.00001
4.46%
3
MICROSOFT CORP USD0.00000625
3.62%
4
AMAZON.COM INC USD0.01
2.26%
5
ALPHABET INC-CL A USD0.001
1.86%
6
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFAC TWD10
1.85%
7
BROADCOM INC NPVIn both
1.57%
8
ALPHABET INC-CL C USD0.001
1.52%
9
Meta Platforms INC USD0.000006
1.52%
10
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC USD0.1
1.12%

Top 10 holdings of VWRL

#HoldingWeight
1
NVIDIA Corp
4.77%
2
Apple Inc
4.24%
3
Microsoft Corp
3.49%
4
Amazon.com Inc
2.33%
5
Alphabet Inc
1.87%
6
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd
1.70%
7
Broadcom IncIn both
1.59%
8
Alphabet Inc
1.44%
9
Meta Platforms Inc
1.17%
10
Micron Technology Inc
1.00%
Compare the largest holdings of Invesco FTSE All-World and VWRL in the overlap checker

Sectors and countries

Largest sectors of Invesco FTSE All-World

  1. Information technology33.3%
  2. Financials16.4%
  3. Industrials10.1%
  4. Consumer discretionary8.4%
  5. Health care8.0%
  6. Communication services7.8%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of Invesco FTSE All-World

  1. United States64.0%
  2. Other12.6%
  3. Japan6.0%
  4. Taiwan3.6%
  5. Canada2.8%
  6. South Korea2.7%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of VWRL

  1. United States61.7%
  2. Japan6.0%
  3. Taiwan3.3%
  4. United Kingdom3.3%
  5. Canada3.0%
  6. China2.7%
+ 4 more

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Invesco FTSE All-World and VWRL?

Invesco FTSE All-World (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc, IE000716YHJ7) and VWRL (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing, IE00B3RBWM25) both track the FTSE All-World index. VWRL has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.15% for Invesco FTSE All-World, 0.01 percentage points less, or about 1 a year on 10,000 invested. Invesco FTSE All-World reinvests its income (accumulating), while VWRL pays it out (distributing). Both are domiciled in Ireland. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Which is cheaper, Invesco FTSE All-World or VWRL?

VWRL has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.15% for Invesco FTSE All-World, 0.01 percentage points less, or about 1 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.15% for Invesco FTSE All-World and 0.14% for VWRL.

Which is bigger, Invesco FTSE All-World or VWRL?

VWRL is the larger fund, with USD 87.29bn in assets against USD 5.27bn for Invesco FTSE All-World, about 17 times the size.

Do Invesco FTSE All-World and VWRL hold the same companies?

1 of the largest holdings of Invesco FTSE All-World (top 10) and VWRL (top 10) appears in both lists; measured on those positions only, the overlap is at least 1.6%. Shared holdings include BROADCOM INC NPV.

How did Invesco FTSE All-World and VWRL perform in 2025?

In 2025, Invesco FTSE All-World returned +22.5% and VWRL +22.6%, a gap of 0.1 percentage points. Over 3 years, Invesco FTSE All-World returned +22.1% a year and VWRL +21.7% a year. Over the past year, Invesco FTSE All-World returned +16.5% and VWRL +16.7%. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Are Invesco FTSE All-World and VWRL accumulating or distributing?

Invesco FTSE All-World is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. VWRL is distributing: it pays its income out to investors.
Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.