ETF comparison

XMME vs AEME

Figures as of October 5, 2026 (XMME) · October 2, 2026 (AEME)

The comparison in short

XMME (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BTJRMP35) and AEME (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc, LU1437017350) both track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. XMME and AEME have the same total expense ratio (TER), 0.18% a year. XMME reports GBP 11.64bn in assets and AEME EUR 10.3bn. 6 of the largest holdings of XMME (top 10) and AEME (top 50) appear in both lists; measured on those positions only, the overlap is at least 14.1%. Shared holdings include SK HYNIX, TENCENT HOLDINGS, MEDIATEK, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING and DELTA ELECTRONICS. In 2025, XMME returned +33.7% and AEME +17.9%, a gap of 15.8 percentage points. Over 5 years, XMME returned +9.6% a year and AEME +9.6% a year. Returns are in each share class's currency (USD and EUR), so part of the gap reflects exchange rates. XMME and AEME both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XMME and AEME both hold the index securities directly (physical replication). XMME is domiciled in Ireland and AEME in Luxembourg. XMME and AEME both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 4 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Side by side

FigureXMMEAEME
ISINIE00BTJRMP35LU1437017350
Exchange tickersXMME, XMMSAEME
Fund houseXtrackersAmundi
Total expense ratio (TER)0.18%0.18%
Ongoing charges (KID)0.18%0.18%
Fund sizeGBP 11.64bnEUR 10.3bn
Launch dateJune 21, 2017May 9, 2017
ReplicationPhysicalPhysical
DomicileIrelandLuxembourg
Distribution policyAccumulatingAccumulating
Share class currencyUSDEUR
Number of holdings—1,170
Risk indicator (SRRI)4 / 74 / 7
BenchmarkMSCI Total Return Net Emerging Markets IndexMSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return USD Index

Performance

Calendar-year returns

YearXMMEAEMEDifference
2025+33.7%+17.9%+15.8
2024+7.5%+14.5%−7.0
2023+9.6%+5.9%+3.7
2022−20.2%−15.0%−5.2
2021−2.7%+4.6%−7.3
2020+18.0%+8.2%+9.8

Annualised returns

PeriodXMMEAEMEDifference
1 year+29.0%+32.0%−3.0
3 years+25.9%+21.2%+4.7
5 years+9.6%+9.6%0.0
Returns as published by each fund house, in each share class's currency and net of the fund's charges. The difference is in percentage points. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Holdings

6 of the largest holdings of XMME (top 10) and AEME (top 50) appear in both lists; measured on those positions only, the overlap is at least 14.1%. Shared holdings include SK HYNIX, TENCENT HOLDINGS, MEDIATEK, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING and DELTA ELECTRONICS.

Top 10 holdings of XMME

#HoldingWeight
1
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING
15.62%
2
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD
7.73%
3
SK HYNIXIn both
6.09%
4
TENCENT HOLDINGSIn both
2.67%
5
MEDIATEKIn both
1.81%
6
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDINGIn both
1.81%
7
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE
0.97%
8
DELTA ELECTRONICSIn both
0.93%
9
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H
0.83%
10
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRYIn both
0.78%

Top 10 holdings of AEME

#HoldingWeight
1
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFAC
15.65%
2
SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO LTD
7.75%
3
SK HYNIX INCIn both
6.11%
4
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTDIn both
2.67%
5
MEDIATEK INCIn both
1.82%
6
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTDIn both
1.81%
7
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS - PFD NV
0.97%
8
DELTA ELECTRONICS INCIn both
0.93%
9
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK HK
0.83%
10
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRYIn both
0.78%
Compare the largest holdings of XMME and AEME in the overlap checker

Sectors and countries

Largest sectors of XMME

  1. Information Technology45.0%
  2. Financials18.7%
  3. Others16.5%
  4. Consumer Discretionary7.3%
  5. Industrials6.7%
  6. Communication Services5.9%

Largest sectors of AEME

  1. Information Technology44.4%
  2. Financials19.0%
  3. Consumer Discretionary7.3%
  4. Industrials6.3%
  5. Communication Services5.8%
  6. Materials5.7%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of XMME

  1. Taiwan26.6%
  2. Korea, Republic of24.2%
  3. China18.2%
  4. Others16.1%
  5. India11.3%
  6. Brazil3.7%

Largest countries of AEME

  1. Taiwan29.1%
  2. South Korea21.9%
  3. China19.2%
  4. India10.4%
  5. Brazil4.2%
  6. South Africa2.9%
+ 19 more

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between XMME and AEME?

XMME (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BTJRMP35) and AEME (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc, LU1437017350) both track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. XMME and AEME have the same total expense ratio (TER), 0.18% a year. XMME and AEME both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XMME and AEME both hold the index securities directly (physical replication). XMME is domiciled in Ireland and AEME in Luxembourg. The share class of XMME is in USD, that of AEME in EUR. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Which is cheaper, XMME or AEME?

XMME and AEME have the same total expense ratio (TER), 0.18% a year. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.18% for XMME and 0.18% for AEME.

Which is bigger, XMME or AEME?

XMME reports GBP 11.64bn in assets and AEME EUR 10.3bn.

Do XMME and AEME hold the same companies?

6 of the largest holdings of XMME (top 10) and AEME (top 50) appear in both lists; measured on those positions only, the overlap is at least 14.1%. Shared holdings include SK HYNIX, TENCENT HOLDINGS, MEDIATEK, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING and DELTA ELECTRONICS.

How did XMME and AEME perform in 2025?

In 2025, XMME returned +33.7% and AEME +17.9%, a gap of 15.8 percentage points. Over 5 years, XMME returned +9.6% a year and AEME +9.6% a year. Over the past year, XMME returned +29.0% and AEME +32.0%. Returns are in each share class's currency (USD and EUR), so part of the gap reflects exchange rates. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Are XMME and AEME accumulating or distributing?

XMME is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. AEME is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.
Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.