ETF comparison

iShares MSCI vs E127

Figures as of October 5, 2026 (iShares MSCI) · September 30, 2026 (E127)

The comparison in short

iShares MSCI (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc), IE00B4L5YC18) and E127 (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist, LU2573966905) both track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. E127 has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.18% for iShares MSCI, 0.04 percentage points less, or about 4 a year on 10,000 invested. E127 is the larger fund, with USD 12.5bn in assets against USD 10.8bn for iShares MSCI. iShares MSCI reports 785 holdings and E127 372. E127 replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured. In 2025, iShares MSCI returned +33.8% and E127 +33.9%, a gap of 0.1 percentage points. Over 3 years, iShares MSCI returned +24.3% a year and E127 +24.2% a year. iShares MSCI reinvests its income (accumulating), while E127 pays it out (distributing). iShares MSCI holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while E127 replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). iShares MSCI is domiciled in Ireland and E127 in Luxembourg. iShares MSCI and E127 both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 4 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Side by side

FigureiShares MSCIE127
ISINIE00B4L5YC18LU2573966905
Exchange tickers—E127, U127, AE5A
Fund houseiSharesAmundi
Total expense ratio (TER)0.18%0.14%
Ongoing charges (KID)0.18%0.14%
Fund sizeUSD 10.8bnUSD 12.5bn
Launch dateSeptember 25, 2009March 24, 2023
ReplicationPhysicalSynthetic (swap)
DomicileIrelandLuxembourg
Distribution policyAccumulatingDistributing
Share class currencyUSDUSD
Number of holdings785372
Risk indicator (SRRI)4 / 74 / 7
SFDR classificationArticle 6—
BenchmarkMSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net)MSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return USD Index

Performance

Calendar-year returns

YeariShares MSCIE127Difference
2025+33.8%+33.9%−0.1
2024+7.6%+7.6%0.0

Annualised returns

PeriodiShares MSCIE127Difference
1 year+27.3%+29.4%−2.1
3 years+24.3%+24.2%+0.1
Returns as published by each fund house, in each share class's currency and net of the fund's charges. The difference is in percentage points. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Holdings

E127 replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.

Top 10 holdings of iShares MSCI

#HoldingWeight
1
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING
15.84%
2
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD
7.59%
3
SK HYNIX
5.99%
4
ISH MSCI CHINA A ETF USD ACC
3.26%
5
TENCENT HOLDINGS
2.63%
6
ISHARES MSCI BRAZIL UCITS ET USDHA
2.23%
7
MEDIATEK
1.88%
8
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING
1.79%
9
DELTA ELECTRONICS
0.98%
10
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE
0.94%

Top 10 holdings of E127

E127 replicates its index through a swap: the securities it publishes are the collateral basket behind the swap, not the index, so they are not compared.
#HoldingWeight
1
AMAZON.COM INC
5.63%
2
APPLE INC
4.23%
3
ALPHABET INC CL C
3.99%
4
NVIDIA CORP
3.65%
5
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
3.51%
6
APPLIED MATERIALS INC
3.48%
7
MICROSOFT CORP
2.88%
8
INTEL CORP
2.21%
9
BROADCOM INC
1.94%
10
TESLA INC
1.82%
Compare the largest holdings of iShares MSCI and E127 in the overlap checker

Sectors and countries

Largest sectors of iShares MSCI

  1. Information Technology43.2%
  2. Financials22.7%
  3. Consumer Discretionary7.0%
  4. Industrials5.7%
  5. Communication5.7%
  6. Materials5.1%
+ 4 more

Largest sectors of E127

  1. Information Technology43.8%
  2. Financials19.4%
  3. Consumer Discretionary7.4%
  4. Industrials6.3%
  5. Communication Services5.9%
  6. Materials5.8%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of iShares MSCI

  1. Taiwan28.9%
  2. Korea (South)21.8%
  3. China15.9%
  4. India10.4%
  5. Other5.8%
  6. Ireland3.3%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of E127

  1. Taiwan28.9%
  2. South Korea21.4%
  3. China19.8%
  4. India10.7%
  5. Brazil4.1%
  6. South Africa2.9%
+ 18 more

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between iShares MSCI and E127?

iShares MSCI (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc), IE00B4L5YC18) and E127 (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist, LU2573966905) both track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. E127 has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.18% for iShares MSCI, 0.04 percentage points less, or about 4 a year on 10,000 invested. iShares MSCI reinvests its income (accumulating), while E127 pays it out (distributing). iShares MSCI holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while E127 replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). iShares MSCI is domiciled in Ireland and E127 in Luxembourg. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Which is cheaper, iShares MSCI or E127?

E127 has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.14% a year against 0.18% for iShares MSCI, 0.04 percentage points less, or about 4 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.18% for iShares MSCI and 0.14% for E127.

Which is bigger, iShares MSCI or E127?

E127 is the larger fund, with USD 12.5bn in assets against USD 10.8bn for iShares MSCI.

Do iShares MSCI and E127 hold the same companies?

E127 replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.

How did iShares MSCI and E127 perform in 2025?

In 2025, iShares MSCI returned +33.8% and E127 +33.9%, a gap of 0.1 percentage points. Over 3 years, iShares MSCI returned +24.3% a year and E127 +24.2% a year. Over the past year, iShares MSCI returned +27.3% and E127 +29.4%. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Are iShares MSCI and E127 accumulating or distributing?

iShares MSCI is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. E127 is distributing: it pays its income out to investors.
Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.