ETF comparison

XNAS vs Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap

Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
IE00BMFKG444Xtrackers
Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
LU1829221024Amundi
Figures as of October 22, 2026 (XNAS) · October 20, 2026 (Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap)

The comparison in short

XNAS (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BMFKG444) and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap (Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc, LU1829221024) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.22% for Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap, 0.02 percentage points less, or about 2 a year on 10,000 invested. Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap is the larger fund, with USD 7.3bn in assets against USD 2.9bn for XNAS, about 2.5 times the size. Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured. In 2025, XNAS returned +20.7% and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap +6.4%, a gap of 14.3 percentage points. Over 5 years, XNAS returned +14.1% a year and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap +18.1% a year. XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XNAS holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). XNAS is domiciled in Ireland and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap in Luxembourg. XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 5 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Side by side

FigureXNASAmundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap
ISINIE00BMFKG444LU1829221024
Exchange tickersXNAS, XNAQ—
Fund houseXtrackersAmundi
Total expense ratio (TER)0.20%0.22%
Ongoing charges (KID)0.20%0.22%
Fund sizeUSD 2.9bnUSD 7.3bn
Launch dateJanuary 21, 2021January 17, 2019
ReplicationPhysicalSynthetic (swap)
DomicileIrelandLuxembourg
Distribution policyAccumulatingAccumulating
Share class currencyUSDUSD
Number of holdings—233
Risk indicator (SRRI)5 / 75 / 7
SFDR classification—Article 6
BenchmarkNASDAQ 100 Index (USD)NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index

Performance

Calendar-year returns

YearXNASAmundi Core Nasdaq-100 SwapDifference
2025+20.7%+6.4%+14.3
2024+25.5%+34.0%−8.5
2023+54.6%+49.5%+5.1
2022−32.6%−28.1%−4.5

Annualised returns

PeriodXNASAmundi Core Nasdaq-100 SwapDifference
1 year+16.8%+38.2%−21.4
3 years+26.3%+30.1%−3.8
5 years+14.1%+18.1%−4.0
Returns as published by each fund house, in each share class's currency and net of the fund's charges. The difference is in percentage points. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Holdings

Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.

Top 10 holdings of XNAS

#HoldingWeight
1
NVIDIA
8.15%
2
APPLE
8.10%
3
MICROSOFT
6.16%
4
AMAZON COM INC
4.31%
5
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
4.25%
6
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
3.65%
7
TESLA INC
3.14%
8
META PLATFORMS CLASS A
3.07%
9
ALPHABET CLASS A
3.03%
10
ALPHABET CLASS C
2.83%

Top 10 holdings of Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap

Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap replicates its index through a swap: the securities it publishes are the collateral basket behind the swap, not the index, so they are not compared.
#HoldingWeight
1
MICROSOFT CORP
8.66%
2
APPLE INC
8.53%
3
NVIDIA CORP
8.30%
4
AMAZON.COM INC
7.22%
5
META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A
4.01%
6
ALPHABET INC CL A
3.27%
7
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
2.80%
8
BROADCOM INC
2.74%
9
TESLA INC
2.73%
10
FORTINET INC
2.17%
Compare the largest holdings of XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap in the overlap checker

Sectors and countries

Largest sectors of XNAS

  1. Technology62.7%
  2. Consumer Discretionary13.7%
  3. Others9.4%
  4. Consumer Staples5.3%
  5. Health Care3.7%

Largest sectors of Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap

  1. Information Technology57.3%
  2. Communication Services14.9%
  3. Consumer Discretionary10.9%
  4. Consumer Staples6.3%
  5. Health Care4.5%
  6. Industrials3.3%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of XNAS

  1. United States95.3%
  2. Netherlands1.2%
  3. Canada1.1%
  4. Ireland1.1%
  5. Others0.6%
  6. United Kingdom0.6%

Largest countries of Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap

  1. United States95.0%
  2. Ireland1.7%
  3. Netherlands1.3%
  4. Canada1.1%
  5. United Kingdom0.6%
  6. Cayman Island0.4%

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap?

XNAS (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BMFKG444) and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap (Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc, LU1829221024) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.22% for Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap, 0.02 percentage points less, or about 2 a year on 10,000 invested. XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XNAS holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). XNAS is domiciled in Ireland and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap in Luxembourg. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Which is cheaper, XNAS or Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap?

XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.22% for Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap, 0.02 percentage points less, or about 2 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.20% for XNAS and 0.22% for Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap.

Which is bigger, XNAS or Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap?

Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap is the larger fund, with USD 7.3bn in assets against USD 2.9bn for XNAS, about 2.5 times the size.

Do XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap hold the same companies?

Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.

How did XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap perform in 2025?

In 2025, XNAS returned +20.7% and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap +6.4%, a gap of 14.3 percentage points. Over 5 years, XNAS returned +14.1% a year and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap +18.1% a year. Over the past year, XNAS returned +16.8% and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap +38.2%. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Are XNAS and Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap accumulating or distributing?

XNAS is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. Amundi Core Nasdaq-100 Swap is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.

Go further

Other comparisons

Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.