ETF comparison

L8IN vs EQQB

Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
FR0011871110Amundi
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc
IE00BFZXGZ54Invesco
Figures as of September 30, 2026 (L8IN) · October 1, 2026 (EQQB)

The comparison in short

L8IN (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc, FR0011871110) and EQQB (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc, IE00BFZXGZ54) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. L8IN and EQQB have the same total expense ratio (TER), 0.30% a year. EQQB is the larger fund, with USD 21.96bn in assets against EUR 1.3bn for L8IN. L8IN reports 62 holdings and EQQB 103. L8IN replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured. In 2025, L8IN returned +6.0% and EQQB +20.6%, a gap of 14.6 percentage points. Over 5 years, L8IN returned +16.4% a year and EQQB +16.0% a year. Returns are in each share class's currency (EUR and USD), so part of the gap reflects exchange rates. L8IN and EQQB both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). EQQB holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while L8IN replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). L8IN is domiciled in France and EQQB in Ireland. L8IN and EQQB both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 5 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Side by side

FigureL8INEQQB
ISINFR0011871110IE00BFZXGZ54
Exchange tickersL8IN, PUSTEQQB, EQAC
Fund houseAmundiInvesco
Total expense ratio (TER)0.3%0.30%
Ongoing charges (KID)0.30%0.30%
Fund sizeEUR 1.3bnUSD 21.96bn
Launch dateMay 20, 2014September 24, 2018
ReplicationSynthetic (swap)Physical
DomicileFranceIreland
Distribution policyAccumulatingAccumulating
Share class currencyEURUSD
Number of holdings62103
Risk indicator (SRRI)5 / 75 / 7
SFDR classification—Article 6
BenchmarkNASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return IndexNASDAQ-100 Index (USD)

Performance

Calendar-year returns

YearL8INEQQBDifference
2025+6.0%+20.6%−14.6
2024+33.6%+25.4%+8.2
2023+49.3%+54.5%−5.2
2022−28.4%−32.6%+4.2
2021+36.6%+27.0%+9.6
2020+36.1%+48.3%−12.2

Annualised returns

PeriodL8INEQQBDifference
1 year+27.5%+23.3%+4.2
3 years+24.6%+27.6%−3.0
5 years+16.4%+16.0%+0.4
Returns as published by each fund house, in each share class's currency and net of the fund's charges. The difference is in percentage points. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Holdings

L8IN replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.

Top 10 holdings of L8IN

L8IN replicates its index through a swap: the securities it publishes are the collateral basket behind the swap, not the index, so they are not compared.
#HoldingWeight
1
ASML HOLDING NV
8.72%
2
ING GROEP NV
8.10%
3
GENMAB A/S
7.34%
4
MERCK KGAA
5.40%
5
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
4.56%
6
MICROSOFT CORP
4.17%
7
EDP SA
4.05%
8
DEUTSCHE BANK AG NAMEN
3.69%
9
NVIDIA CORP
3.62%
10
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL
3.47%

Top 10 holdings of EQQB

#HoldingWeight
1
Nvidia
8.52%
2
Apple
7.42%
3
Microsoft
6.01%
4
Micron Technology
4.76%
5
Amazon
4.46%
6
Advanced Micro Devices
3.38%
7
Alphabet
3.15%
8
Tesla
2.93%
9
Alphabet
2.92%
10
Broadcom
2.80%
Compare every published holding of L8IN and EQQB in the overlap checker

Sectors and countries

Largest sectors of L8IN

  1. Information Technology59.9%
  2. Communication Services15.0%
  3. Consumer Discretionary10.1%
  4. Consumer Staples5.6%
  5. Health Care3.8%
  6. Industrials3.1%
+ 4 more

Largest sectors of EQQB

  1. Information technology58.6%
  2. Communication services13.7%
  3. Consumer discretionary11.1%
  4. Consumer staples6.2%
  5. Health care4.0%
  6. Industrials3.6%
+ 4 more

Largest countries of L8IN

  1. United States94.8%
  2. Ireland1.8%
  3. Netherlands1.4%
  4. Canada0.9%
  5. United Kingdom0.7%
  6. Cayman Island0.4%

Largest countries of EQQB

  1. United States97.0%
  2. Netherlands1.1%
  3. Canada1.0%
  4. Brazil0.4%
  5. China0.2%
  6. United Kingdom0.2%

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between L8IN and EQQB?

L8IN (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc, FR0011871110) and EQQB (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc, IE00BFZXGZ54) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. L8IN and EQQB have the same total expense ratio (TER), 0.30% a year. L8IN and EQQB both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). EQQB holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while L8IN replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). L8IN is domiciled in France and EQQB in Ireland. The share class of L8IN is in EUR, that of EQQB in USD. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.

Which is cheaper, L8IN or EQQB?

L8IN and EQQB have the same total expense ratio (TER), 0.30% a year. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.30% for L8IN and 0.30% for EQQB.

Which is bigger, L8IN or EQQB?

EQQB is the larger fund, with USD 21.96bn in assets against EUR 1.3bn for L8IN.

Do L8IN and EQQB hold the same companies?

L8IN replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.

How did L8IN and EQQB perform in 2025?

In 2025, L8IN returned +6.0% and EQQB +20.6%, a gap of 14.6 percentage points. Over 5 years, L8IN returned +16.4% a year and EQQB +16.0% a year. Over the past year, L8IN returned +27.5% and EQQB +23.3%. Returns are in each share class's currency (EUR and USD), so part of the gap reflects exchange rates. Past performance does not predict future returns.

Are L8IN and EQQB accumulating or distributing?

L8IN is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. EQQB is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.

Go further

Other comparisons

Figures are read from the documents each fund house publishes (product page, factsheet, key information document, holdings file) and refreshed weekly. Names and tickers identify the products; FundFacts API is independent of every fund house and index provider. This comparison is factual information, not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell either fund.