L8IN vs XNAS
FR0011871110AmundiIE00BMFKG444XtrackersThe comparison in short
L8IN (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc, FR0011871110) and XNAS (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BMFKG444) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.30% for L8IN, 0.1 percentage points less, or about 10 a year on 10,000 invested. L8IN reports EUR 1.3bn in assets and XNAS GBP 2.16bn. L8IN replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured. In 2025, L8IN returned +6.0% and XNAS +20.7%, a gap of 14.7 percentage points. Over 5 years, L8IN returned +16.4% a year and XNAS +16.1% a year. Returns are in each share class's currency (EUR and USD), so part of the gap reflects exchange rates. L8IN and XNAS both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XNAS holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while L8IN replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). L8IN is domiciled in France and XNAS in Ireland. L8IN and XNAS both carry a risk indicator (SRRI) of 5 on the 1–7 scale. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.
Side by side
| Figure | L8IN | XNAS |
|---|---|---|
| ISIN | FR0011871110 | IE00BMFKG444 |
| Exchange tickers | L8IN, PUST | XNAS, XNAQ |
| Fund house | Amundi | Xtrackers |
| Total expense ratio (TER) | 0.3% | 0.20% |
| Ongoing charges (KID) | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Fund size | EUR 1.3bn | GBP 2.16bn |
| Launch date | May 20, 2014 | January 21, 2021 |
| Replication | Synthetic (swap) | Physical |
| Domicile | France | Ireland |
| Distribution policy | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Share class currency | EUR | USD |
| Number of holdings | 62 | — |
| Risk indicator (SRRI) | 5 / 7 | 5 / 7 |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index | NASDAQ 100 Index (USD) |
Performance
Calendar-year returns
| Year | L8IN | XNAS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +6.0% | +20.7% | −14.7 |
| 2024 | +33.6% | +25.5% | +8.1 |
| 2023 | +49.3% | +54.6% | −5.3 |
| 2022 | −28.4% | −32.6% | +4.2 |
Annualised returns
| Period | L8IN | XNAS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | +27.5% | +23.4% | +4.1 |
| 3 years | +24.6% | +28.0% | −3.4 |
| 5 years | +16.4% | +16.1% | +0.3 |
Holdings
L8IN replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.
Top 10 holdings of L8IN
L8IN replicates its index through a swap: the securities it publishes are the collateral basket behind the swap, not the index, so they are not compared.| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASML HOLDING NV | 8.72% |
| 2 | ING GROEP NV | 8.10% |
| 3 | GENMAB A/S | 7.34% |
| 4 | MERCK KGAA | 5.40% |
| 5 | SIEMENS ENERGY AG | 4.56% |
| 6 | MICROSOFT CORP | 4.17% |
| 7 | EDP SA | 4.05% |
| 8 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NAMEN | 3.69% |
| 9 | NVIDIA CORP | 3.62% |
| 10 | JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL | 3.47% |
Top 10 holdings of XNAS
| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVIDIA | 8.41% |
| 2 | APPLE | 7.29% |
| 3 | MICROSOFT | 5.76% |
| 4 | MICRON TECHNOLOGY | 5.18% |
| 5 | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.20% |
| 6 | AMAZON COM INC | 4.05% |
| 7 | META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 3.27% |
| 8 | ALPHABET CLASS A | 3.00% |
| 9 | TESLA INC | 2.81% |
| 10 | ALPHABET CLASS C | 2.80% |
Sectors and countries
Largest sectors of L8IN
- 59.9%
- 15.0%
- 10.1%
- 5.6%
- 3.8%
- 3.1%
Largest sectors of XNAS
- 62.7%
- 13.7%
- 9.4%
- 5.3%
- 3.7%
Largest countries of L8IN
- 94.8%
- 1.8%
- 1.4%
- 0.9%
- 0.7%
- 0.4%
Largest countries of XNAS
- 95.6%
- 1.4%
- 0.9%
- 0.9%
- 0.7%
- 0.6%
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between L8IN and XNAS?
L8IN (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc, FR0011871110) and XNAS (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C, IE00BMFKG444) both track the NASDAQ-100 index. XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.30% for L8IN, 0.1 percentage points less, or about 10 a year on 10,000 invested. L8IN and XNAS both reinvest their income (accumulating share classes). XNAS holds the index securities directly (physical replication), while L8IN replicates its index through a swap (synthetic). L8IN is domiciled in France and XNAS in Ireland. The share class of L8IN is in EUR, that of XNAS in USD. This is a factual comparison from the fund houses' documents, not investment advice.Which is cheaper, L8IN or XNAS?
XNAS has the lower total expense ratio (TER): 0.20% a year against 0.30% for L8IN, 0.1 percentage points less, or about 10 a year on 10,000 invested. Their key information documents state ongoing charges of 0.30% for L8IN and 0.20% for XNAS.Which is bigger, L8IN or XNAS?
L8IN reports EUR 1.3bn in assets and XNAS GBP 2.16bn.Do L8IN and XNAS hold the same companies?
L8IN replicates its index through a swap and publishes the collateral basket behind it, so the holdings overlap is not measured.How did L8IN and XNAS perform in 2025?
In 2025, L8IN returned +6.0% and XNAS +20.7%, a gap of 14.7 percentage points. Over 5 years, L8IN returned +16.4% a year and XNAS +16.1% a year. Over the past year, L8IN returned +27.5% and XNAS +23.4%. Returns are in each share class's currency (EUR and USD), so part of the gap reflects exchange rates. Past performance does not predict future returns.Are L8IN and XNAS accumulating or distributing?
L8IN is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund. XNAS is accumulating: it reinvests its income in the fund.Go further
Other comparisons
- GX1A vs XNASiShares NASDAQ-100® UCITS ETF (DE) · Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
- EQQQ vs XNASInvesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Dist · Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
- EQQB vs XNASInvesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc · Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF 1C
- GX1A vs L8INiShares NASDAQ-100® UCITS ETF (DE) · Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc
- L8IN vs EQQQAmundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc · Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Dist
- L8IN vs EQQBAmundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc · Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF Acc